Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plasma Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Identifying Pathogens: a Retrospective Review of Test Utilization in a Large Children's Hospital.
Niles, Denver T; Wijetunge, Dona S S; Palazzi, Debra L; Singh, Ila R; Revell, Paula A.
Affiliation
  • Niles DT; Infectious Disease Section, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Wijetunge DSS; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Palazzi DL; Infectious Disease Section, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Singh IR; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Revell PA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA parevell@texaschildrens.org.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(11)2020 10 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32817087
ABSTRACT
Plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a new diagnostic method used to potentially identify multiple pathogens with a single DNA-based diagnostic test. The test is expensive, and little is understood about where it fits into the diagnostic schema. We describe our experience at Texas Children's Hospital with the mNGS assay by Karius from Redwood City, CA, to determine whether mNGS offers additional diagnostic value when performed within 1 week before or after conventional testing (CT) (i.e., concurrently). We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had mNGS testing from April to June of 2019. Results for mNGS testing, collection time, time of result entry into the electronic medical record, and turnaround time were compared to those for CT performed concurrently. Discordant results were further reviewed for changes in antimicrobials due to the additional organism(s) identified by mNGS. Sixty patients had mNGS testing; the majority were immunosuppressed (62%). There was 61% positive agreement and 58% negative agreement between mNGS and CT. The mean time of result entry into the electronic medical record for CT was 3.5 days earlier than the mean result time for mNGS. When an additional organism(s) was identified by mNGS, antimicrobials were changed 26% of the time. On average, CT provided the same result as mNGS, but sooner than mNGS. When additional organisms were identified by mNGS, there was no change in management in the majority of cases. Overall, mNGS added little diagnostic value when ordered concurrently with CT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metagenomics / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Clin Microbiol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metagenomics / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Clin Microbiol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...