Inflammatory cell profile using different autologous fibrin protocols.

ABSTRACT

Autologous fibrin has been widely used in surgical procedures for both soft and hard tissue repair. There are different protocols and devices to obtain this matrix, with varying centrifugal time, gravity force, speed, angle of the sample tube and spinning radius. The aim of this study was to compare three methods of obtaining autologous fibrin L-PRF using the Intra-Spin L-PRF centrifuge (Dohan protocol), the advanced PRF (A-PRF) using the Intra-Spin L-PRF centrifuge and autologous leukocyte fibrin (ALF), using the Kasvi centrifuge. Venous blood was collected from 7 healthy volunteers, which were submitted to the 3 different methods of centrifugation. The membranes were tissue-processed and evaluated by immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD20, CD68 and CD138. For CD68+, a lower number of cells was immunolabelled in the L-PRF group when compared to the other groups (A-PRF and ALF). For CD3+, a lower number of immunolabellated cells was observed in the ALF group when compared to the remaining groups (p < 0.05). In the A-PRF group, the CD20+ cell count was lower than in the remaining groups. No difference was observed in CD138+ cell counts between the groups. The 3 protocols tested are suitable for obtaining autologous fibrin membranes.