Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The results of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic.
Jochum, Malte; Fischer, Markus; Isbell, Forest; Roscher, Christiane; van der Plas, Fons; Boch, Steffen; Boenisch, Gerhard; Buchmann, Nina; Catford, Jane A; Cavender-Bares, Jeannine; Ebeling, Anne; Eisenhauer, Nico; Gleixner, Gerd; Hölzel, Norbert; Kattge, Jens; Klaus, Valentin H; Kleinebecker, Till; Lange, Markus; Le Provost, Gaëtane; Meyer, Sebastian T; Molina-Venegas, Rafael; Mommer, Liesje; Oelmann, Yvonne; Penone, Caterina; Prati, Daniel; Reich, Peter B; Rindisbacher, Abiel; Schäfer, Deborah; Scheu, Stefan; Schmid, Bernhard; Tilman, David; Tscharntke, Teja; Vogel, Anja; Wagg, Cameron; Weigelt, Alexandra; Weisser, Wolfgang W; Wilcke, Wolfgang; Manning, Peter.
Affiliation
  • Jochum M; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. malte.jochum@idiv.de.
  • Fischer M; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. malte.jochum@idiv.de.
  • Isbell F; Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. malte.jochum@idiv.de.
  • Roscher C; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • van der Plas F; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Boch S; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Boenisch G; Department of Physiological Diversity, UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Buchmann N; Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Catford JA; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Cavender-Bares J; WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
  • Ebeling A; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
  • Eisenhauer N; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Gleixner G; Department of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Hölzel N; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Kattge J; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Klaus VH; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Kleinebecker T; Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Lange M; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
  • Le Provost G; Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Meyer ST; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Molina-Venegas R; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
  • Mommer L; Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Oelmann Y; Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Giessen University, Giessen, Germany.
  • Penone C; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
  • Prati D; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Reich PB; Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
  • Rindisbacher A; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Schäfer D; GloCEE-Global Change Ecology & Evolution group, Department of Life Sciences, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
  • Scheu S; Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Schmid B; Geoecology, Geoscience Department, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Tilman D; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Tscharntke T; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Vogel A; Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Wagg C; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith South DC, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Weigelt A; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Weisser WW; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Wilcke W; JF Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Manning P; Centre for Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Nat Ecol Evol ; 4(11): 1485-1494, 2020 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839545
A large body of research shows that biodiversity loss can reduce ecosystem functioning. However, much of the evidence for this relationship is drawn from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments in which biodiversity loss is simulated by randomly assembling communities of varying species diversity, and ecosystem functions are measured. This random assembly has led some ecologists to question the relevance of biodiversity experiments to real-world ecosystems, where community assembly or disassembly may be non-random and influenced by external drivers, such as climate, soil conditions or land use. Here, we compare data from real-world grassland plant communities with data from two of the largest and longest-running grassland biodiversity experiments (the Jena Experiment in Germany and BioDIV in the United States) in terms of their taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity and functional-trait composition. We found that plant communities of biodiversity experiments cover almost all of the multivariate variation of the real-world communities, while also containing community types that are not currently observed in the real world. Moreover, they have greater variance in their compositional features than their real-world counterparts. We then re-analysed a subset of experimental data that included only ecologically realistic communities (that is, those comparable to real-world communities). For 10 out of 12 biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships, biodiversity effects did not differ significantly between the full dataset of biodiversity experiments and the ecologically realistic subset of experimental communities. Although we do not provide direct evidence for strong or consistent biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in real-world communities, our results demonstrate that the results of biodiversity experiments are largely insensitive to the exclusion of unrealistic communities and that the conclusions drawn from biodiversity experiments are generally robust.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ecosystem / Biodiversity Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ecosystem / Biodiversity Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United kingdom