Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility study of a smartphone pupillometer and evaluation of its accuracy.
Neice, Andrew E; Fowler, Cedar; Jaffe, Richard A; Brock-Utne, John G.
Affiliation
  • Neice AE; Oregon Anesthesiology Group, Portland, OR, USA. Andrew.Neice@gmail.com.
  • Fowler C; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Jaffe RA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Brock-Utne JG; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 35(6): 1269-1277, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951188
ABSTRACT
Measurement of pupillary characteristics, such as pupillary unrest in ambient light, and reflex dilation have been shown to be useful in a variety of clinical situations. Dedicated pupillometers typically capture images in the near-infrared to allow imaging in both light and darkness. However, because a subset of pupillary measurements can be acquired with levels of visible light suitable for conventional cameras, it is theoretically possible to capture data using general purpose cameras and computing devices such as those found on smartphones. Here we describe the development of a smartphone-based pupillometer and compare its performance with a commercial pupillometer. Smartphone pupillometry software was developed and then compared with a commercial pupillometer by performing simultaneous scans in both eyes, using the smartphone pupillometer and a commercial pupillometer. The raw scans were compared, as well as a selected pupillary index pupillary unrest in ambient light. In 77% of the scans the software was able to successfully identify the pupil and iris. The raw data as well as calculated values of pupillary unrest in ambient light were in clinically acceptable levels of agreement; Bland-Altman analysis of raw pupil measurements yielded a 95% confidence interval of 0.26 mm. In certain situations a smartphone pupillometer may be an appropriate alternative to a commercial pupillometer.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pupil / Smartphone Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pupil / Smartphone Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States