Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical predictive modelling of post-surgical recovery in individuals with cervical radiculopathy: a machine learning approach.
Liew, Bernard X W; Peolsson, Anneli; Rugamer, David; Wibault, Johanna; Löfgren, Hakan; Dedering, Asa; Zsigmond, Peter; Falla, Deborah.
Affiliation
  • Liew BXW; School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK. liew_xwb@hotmail.com.
  • Peolsson A; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Rugamer D; Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Wibault J; Chair of Statistics, School of Business and Economics, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Löfgren H; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Dedering A; Department of Activity and Health, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Zsigmond P; Neuro-Orthopedic Center, Jönköping, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.
  • Falla D; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 16782, 2020 10 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033308
Prognostic models play an important role in the clinical management of cervical radiculopathy (CR). No study has compared the performance of modern machine learning techniques, against more traditional stepwise regression techniques, when developing prognostic models in individuals with CR. We analysed a prospective cohort dataset of 201 individuals with CR. Four modelling techniques (stepwise regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO], boosting, and multivariate adaptive regression splines [MuARS]) were each used to form a prognostic model for each of four outcomes obtained at a 12 month follow-up (disability-neck disability index [NDI]), quality of life (EQ5D), present neck pain intensity, and present arm pain intensity). For all four outcomes, the differences in mean performance between all four models were small (difference of NDI < 1 point; EQ5D < 0.1 point; neck and arm pain < 2 points). Given that the predictive accuracy of all four modelling methods were clinically similar, the optimal modelling method may be selected based on the parsimony of predictors. Some of the most parsimonious models were achieved using MuARS, a non-linear technique. Modern machine learning methods may be used to probe relationships along different regions of the predictor space.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiculopathy / Cervical Vertebrae / Neck Pain / Recovery of Function / Machine Learning / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiculopathy / Cervical Vertebrae / Neck Pain / Recovery of Function / Machine Learning / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom