NONPERFUSION ASSESSMENT IN RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Comparison Between Ultra-widefield Fluorescein Angiography and Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) in the assessment of nonperfusion in retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 43 eyes of 43 patients with RVO examined using both widefield OCTA (PLEX Elite, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) with a panoramic montage of five 12 × 12-mm images and UWFA (Optos, 200°). Qualitative analysis was performed according to nonperfusion areas (cutoff: three disk areas) on widefield OCTA. The quantitative analysis assessed the vascular density on the widefield OCTA and ischemic index on UWFA. RESULTS: The ischemic index on UWFA and vascular density in the superficial and deep plexus correlated significantly (P = 0.019, r = 0.357 and P < 0.013, r = 0.375, respectively). The qualitative classification on widefield OCTA and ischemic index on UWFA correlated significantly (P < 0.001, r = 0.618). For the detection of marked nonperfusion (ischemic index ≥ 25%), widefield OCTA had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 64.9%. CONCLUSION: The presence of nonperfusion on UWFA correlated with widefield OCTA. Optical coherence tomography angiography could help to identify high-risk RVO patients who might benefit from a further evaluation using fluorescein angiography.