Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Superior Specimen and Diagnostic Accuracy with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsies Using 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Core Needles.
Shah, Rucha M; Schmidt, Jason; John, Elizabeth; Rastegari, Sheila; Acharya, Priyanka; Kedia, Prashant.
Affiliation
  • Shah RM; Department of Gastroenterology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Schmidt J; Department of Pathology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • John E; Department of Gastroenterology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Rastegari S; Department of Internal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Acharya P; Methodist Health System Clinical Research Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Kedia P; Department of Gastroenterology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clin Endosc ; 54(5): 739-744, 2021 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189102
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized. RESULTS: The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: Clin Endosc Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Korea (South)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: Clin Endosc Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Korea (South)