Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Equipment failures in laparoscopic surgery: Causes and consequences.
Paracchini, S; Bustos, B; Aviles, R; Bourdel, N; Canis, M; Rabischong, B; Slim, K; Botchorishvili, R.
Affiliation
  • Paracchini S; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Scienza e della Salute di Torino, Torino, Italy. Electronic address: saraparacchini89@gmail.com.
  • Bustos B; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Hospital Parroquial de San Bernardo, Region Metropolitana, Chile.
  • Aviles R; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Dr. Luis-Valentìn-Ferrada, Universidad Finis-Terrae, El-Carmen, Maipù, Chile.
  • Bourdel N; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Canis M; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Rabischong B; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Slim K; Service de chirurgie digestive, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Botchorishvili R; Department of Gynecological Surgery, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Visc Surg ; 158(6): 476-480, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33223479
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess incidence, causes and consequences of equipment failures in a high volume, advanced endoscopic surgery department.

METHODS:

This is a prospectical observational single centre study between April and July of 2019 in the Gynecological surgery department of the Estaing University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France. During the study period, 171 laparoscopies were observed. Data were collected real time by three supernumerary observers.

RESULTS:

In total, 66 (38.6%) laparoscopies were complicated by equipment failures. The bipolar cable and forceps accounted for 31% of the total amount of malfunctions in laparoscopy. Causes of malfunctions were in 45% due to the instrument per se and in 43% due to the incorrect combination of elements. Less commonly, the equipment was not available or a mismatched was reported. The total length of the surgery increased by 1.35% due to the malfunctions. Human error was identified in 50% of cases. No morbility, neither mortality was reported in this series; however we observed 34 malfunctions that could have led to serious consequences for the patients and 3 incidents induced a real consequence on the operation workflow.

CONCLUSIONS:

Equipment failure is a common event in endoscopy. On the opposite, time wasted for the malfunctions is low in laparoscopy, as it only accounts for 1.35% of the overall surgical time. Human decisions contributed to malfunctions in almost half of cases. This alarming finding may advise for intensification in training on instruments of the whole surgical team.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Visc Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: J Visc Surg Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article