Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A commentary on ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession and the APhA Code of Ethics.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 61(2): e68-e70, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33229186
The American Pharmacists Association Code of Ethics ("Code") was established in 1852 and has undergone 5 modifications, most recently in 1994. As point of care shifts from product to cognitive clinical service, pharmacists are expected to encounter an increasing quantity and complexity of ethical and moral dilemmas. In view of this professional transformation and current worldwide challenges, this seems an appropriate time for dialogue on a modification of the Code. The 3 important questions before the profession are as follows: (1) Is the scope of available ethical guidance adequate? (2) Are pharmacists competent in ethical decision-making? (3) Is current pharmacy education and training adequately preparing students for ethical decision-making? The first question is included as part of the Pharmacy Law, Ethics, and Risk course at the University of Utah College of Pharmacy. The following commentary is based on a student's persuasive paper that the Code should remain unmodified owing to the following factors: greater detail does not ensure improved guidance, and modification may lead to confusion in professional role and responsibilities and may not consider patients' values and preferences in decision-making. To improve ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession, this commentary further suggests that questions 2 and 3 are key to facilitating improved readiness and competency in pharmacists' ethical decision-making. Pharmacy students should be given a more thorough education in ethics, and practicing pharmacists should continually expand their knowledge and continued professional development in ethics.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacies / Pharmacy Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pharmacies / Pharmacy Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Journal subject: FARMACIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States