Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can an injured discoid lateral meniscus be returned to the correct anatomic position and size of the native lateral meniscus after surgery?
Kim, Seong Hwan; Lee, Joong Won; Kim, Kang-Il; Lee, Sang Hak.
Affiliation
  • Kim SH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim KI; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: sangdory@hanmail.net.
Knee ; 28: 25-35, 2021 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279872
BACKGROUND: No previous studies have compared the position and size of the remaining discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) with that of a normal lateral meniscus. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative position and size of DLM compared with that of normal controls using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study involved 52 symptomatic complete type DLMs (discoid group) who underwent arthroscopic surgery and 50 normal controls (control group). Pre- and postoperative MRI evaluations, height, width, and relative percentage of extrusion (RPE) were assessed. Sagittal position parameters, including distances from articular cartilage center to anterior meniscus (CAMD) and from anterior articular cartilage margin to anterior horn (ACMD), were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to find factors with extrusion of remaining DLM. RESULTS: The height of the discoid group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P = 0.000). RPE in the discoid group was significantly larger than in the control group (P = 0.005). Only CAMD and ACMD in the discoid group were different (positioned more anteriorly) from the control group (P = 0.000). Preoperative meniscal shift (odds ratio (OR): 12.448; P = 0.003) and operative technique, especially partial meniscectomy with repair (OR: 19.125; P = 0.000), were the major factors associated with extrusion. CONCLUSION: The width of remaining DLM was comparable to that of normal controls, but the position was found to be more anterior and lateral than that of normal controls. Preoperative meniscal shift and combined meniscus repair were the major factors for smaller width and greater extrusion; thus, surgeons should address and counsel these factors before surgery.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Menisci, Tibial / Tibial Meniscus Injuries Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Knee Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Menisci, Tibial / Tibial Meniscus Injuries Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Knee Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Netherlands