Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distribution of pressure on the breast in mammography using flexible and rigid compression plates: implications on patient handling.
Dustler, Magnus; Förnvik, Daniel; Timberg, Pontus; Zackrisson, Sophia; Muller, Serge.
Affiliation
  • Dustler M; Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Förnvik D; Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Timberg P; Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Zackrisson S; Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Muller S; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Acta Radiol ; 62(12): 1583-1591, 2021 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280392
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Breast compression in mammography is important but is a source of discomfort and has been linked to screening non-attendance. Reducing compression has little effect on breast thickness, and likely little effect on image quality, due to force being absorbed in the stiff juxta thoracic area instead of in the central breast.

PURPOSE:

To investigate whether a flexible compression plate can redistribute force to the central breast and whether this affects perceived pain. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Twenty-eight women recalled from mammography screening were compressed with flexible and rigid plates while retaining force and positioning, 15 in the craniocaudal (CC) view and 13 in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. Pressure distribution was continuously measured using pressure sensors.

RESULTS:

The flexible plate showed greater mean breast pressure in both views 2.8 versus 2.3 kPa for CC (confidence interval [CI] = 0.2-0.8) and 1.0 versus 0.5 kPa for MLO (CI = 0.2-0.6). The percentage of applied force distributed to the breast was significantly higher with the flexible plate, both on CC (36% vs. 22%, CI = 1-11) and MLO (30% vs. 14%, CI = 4-13).

CONCLUSION:

The flexible plate redistributes pressure to the central breast, achieving a better compression, particularly in the MLO view, though much applied force is still applied to the juxta thoracic region.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure / Breast / Mammography / Pain Perception / Pain, Procedural Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Acta Radiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure / Breast / Mammography / Pain Perception / Pain, Procedural Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Acta Radiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Sweden