Male erectile function after treatment for colorectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Colorectal Dis
; 23(2): 367-375, 2021 Feb.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33306262
AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the knowledge gap in the field of erectile function (EF) after colorectal cancer surgery and investigate and compare long-term male EF in colon and rectal cancer survivors in a national population. METHOD: Danish male patients alive without evidence of recurrence who were treated for colon or rectal cancer between May 2001 and December 2014 were invited to participate. Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score the derived dichotomized erectile dysfunction (ED) was defined as moderate/severe or no/mild. Patients were grouped based on type of surgery [colon resection, rectal resection (RR) or local resection] and stratified for stoma, preoperative radiotherapy (RT), age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. RESULTS: Of 10 037 eligible patients, 4334 responded (43.18%). The EF score was significantly lower for RR (mean 12.14) compared with both colon resection (mean 15.82) and local resection (mean 14.81) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference between colon resection and local resection was found (p = 0.29). Both a stoma and the use of RT were independent risk factors for ED. After excluding patients with stoma and RT and adjusting for age and ASA score, RR still had a higher risk of ED (OR 1.42, CI 1.20-1.67) compared with colon resection. CONCLUSION: RR has a negative affect on EF. No difference between patients who underwent colon resection and local resection was found. RT and stoma were independent risk factors for ED.
Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Colorectal Neoplasms
/
Erectile Dysfunction
Type of study:
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limits:
Humans
/
Male
Language:
En
Journal:
Colorectal Dis
Journal subject:
GASTROENTEROLOGIA
Year:
2021
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Denmark
Country of publication:
United kingdom