Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Male erectile function after treatment for colorectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Laurberg, Jens Reumert; Laurberg, Viktoria Reumert; Elfeki, Hossam; Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard; Emmertsen, Katrine J.
Affiliation
  • Laurberg JR; Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Laurberg VR; Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Elfeki H; Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Jensen JB; Department of Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Emmertsen KJ; Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(2): 367-375, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33306262
AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the knowledge gap in the field of erectile function (EF) after colorectal cancer surgery and investigate and compare long-term male EF in colon and rectal cancer survivors in a national population. METHOD: Danish male patients alive without evidence of recurrence who were treated for colon or rectal cancer between May 2001 and December 2014 were invited to participate. Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score the derived dichotomized erectile dysfunction (ED) was defined as moderate/severe or no/mild. Patients were grouped based on type of surgery [colon resection, rectal resection (RR) or local resection] and stratified for stoma, preoperative radiotherapy (RT), age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. RESULTS: Of 10 037 eligible patients, 4334 responded (43.18%). The EF score was significantly lower for RR (mean 12.14) compared with both colon resection (mean 15.82) and local resection (mean 14.81) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference between colon resection and local resection was found (p = 0.29). Both a stoma and the use of RT were independent risk factors for ED. After excluding patients with stoma and RT and adjusting for age and ASA score, RR still had a higher risk of ED (OR 1.42, CI 1.20-1.67) compared with colon resection. CONCLUSION: RR has a negative affect on EF. No difference between patients who underwent colon resection and local resection was found. RT and stoma were independent risk factors for ED.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Erectile Dysfunction Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Erectile Dysfunction Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark Country of publication: United kingdom