Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
Allen, Paul Stafford; Pugh, Simone N; Bright, Jo-Anne; Taylor, Duncan A; Curran, James M; Kerr, Zane; Buckleton, John S.
Affiliation
  • Allen PS; DNA Technical Lead, Cellmark Forensic Services, Forensic Reporting Team, Abingdon Laboratory, United Kingdom. Electronic address: pstaffordallen@cellmark.co.uk.
  • Pugh SN; California Department of Justice, Redding, CA, USA.
  • Bright JA; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
  • Taylor DA; Forensic Science South Australia, 21 Divett Place, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Curran JM; University of Auckland, Department of Statistics, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kerr Z; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
  • Buckleton JS; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand; University of Auckland, Department of Statistics, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: john.buckleton@esr.cri.nz.
Forensic Sci Int Genet ; 51: 102434, 2021 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348219
ABSTRACT
DNA mixtures will have multiple donors under both the prosecution and alternate propositions when assigning a likelihood ratio for forensic DNA evidence. These donors are usually assumed to be unrelated to each other. In this paper, we make a small, preliminary examination of the potential effect of relaxing this assumption. We consider the simple situation of a two-person mixture with no dropout and a two-person major/minor mixture with dropout of the minor contributor. We make no adjustment for subpopulation effects. Mixtures were simulated under two assumptions 1. that the donors were siblings 2. or that they were unrelated. Both unresolvable and major/minor mixtures were considered. We compared the likelihood ratio assuming sibship with the likelihood ratio assuming no relatedness. The LR for hypotheses assuming no relatedness is less than the LR assuming relatedness approximately 95% of the time when relatives are present in the mixture.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: DNA / Likelihood Functions / DNA Fingerprinting Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Forensic Sci Int Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / JURISPRUDENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: DNA / Likelihood Functions / DNA Fingerprinting Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Forensic Sci Int Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / JURISPRUDENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article