Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19.
Douville, Nicholas J; Douville, Christopher B; Mentz, Graciela; Mathis, Michael R; Pancaro, Carlo; Tremper, Kevin K; Engoren, Milo.
Affiliation
  • Douville NJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute of Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: ndouvill@med.umich.edu.
  • Douville CB; Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicin
  • Mentz G; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Mathis MR; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Pancaro C; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Tremper KK; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Engoren M; Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Br J Anaesth ; 126(3): 578-589, 2021 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454051
BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have high mortality and resource utilisation. The ability to predict which patients may require mechanical ventilation allows increased acuity of care and targeted interventions to potentially mitigate deterioration. METHODS: We included hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this single-centre retrospective observational study. Our primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death within 24 h. As clinical decompensation is more recognisable, but less modifiable, as the prediction window shrinks, we also assessed 4, 8, and 48 h prediction windows. Model features included demographic information, laboratory results, comorbidities, medication administration, and vital signs. We created a Random Forest model, and assessed performance using 10-fold cross-validation. The model was compared with models derived from generalised estimating equations using discrimination. RESULTS: Ninety-three (23%) of 398 patients required mechanical ventilation or died within 14 days of admission. The Random Forest model predicted pending mechanical ventilation with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.858; 95% confidence interval, 0.841-0.874), which is comparable with the discrimination of the generalised estimating equation regression. Vitals sign data including SpO2/FiO2 ratio (Random Forest Feature Importance Z-score=8.56), ventilatory frequency (5.97), and heart rate (5.87) had the highest predictive utility. In our highest-risk cohort, the number of patients needed to identify a single new case was 3.2, and for our second quintile it was 5.0. CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be leveraged to improve the ability to predict which patients with COVID-19 are likely to require mechanical ventilation, identifying unrecognised bellwethers and providing insight into the constellation of accompanying signs of respiratory failure in COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Clinical Decision-Making / Machine Learning / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiration, Artificial / Clinical Decision-Making / Machine Learning / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United kingdom