Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Intravenous Chemotherapy (Chemoreduction) for Retinoblastoma Based on Patient Age in 964 Eyes of 554 Patients.
Bas, Zeynep; Dalvin, Lauren A; Tadepalli, Sameeksha; Rao, Raksha; Shah, Amish; Leahey, Ann M; Shields, Carol L.
Affiliation
  • Bas Z; Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Dalvin LA; Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Tadepalli S; Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Rao R; Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Shah A; Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Leahey AM; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Shields CL; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) ; 10(4): 373-380, 2021 Jan 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481399
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate retinoblastoma control after intravenous chemotherapy (chemoreduction) by patient age at presentation.

DESIGN:

Retrospective case series.

METHODS:

This study included 964 eyes of 554 patients treated with chemoreduction at Ocular Oncology Service at Wills Eye Hospital. Patients received 6 monthly cycles of standard chemoreduction. Additional therapies for tumor control were performed as needed.

RESULTS:

Of 964 eyes, a comparison by age group (<6 months vs. 6-12 months vs. 13-24 months vs. >24 months) revealed more advanced age group with higher frequency of group E tumor (15% vs. 25% vs. 32% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). By treatment outcomes, complete tumor control was achieved with chemoreduction alone more often in less advanced age group (46% vs. 30% vs. 17% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Additional treatment after chemoreduction was needed more often in more advanced age group with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 9% vs. 16% vs. 20% vs. 15%, P = 0.006) or enucleation (12% vs. 18% vs. 26% vs. 37%, P < 0.001). Over time (1994-1998 vs. 1999-2003 vs. 2004-2008 vs. 2009-2013 vs. 2014-2019), the paradigm for additional required treatment after chemoreduction shifted toward less EBRT (27% vs. 24% vs. 14% vs. 7% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and more intra-arterial (0% vs. 0% vs. 1% vs. 25% vs. 48%, P < 0.001) and intravitreal (0% vs. 0% vs. 3% vs. 10% vs. 20%, P < 0.001) chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Chemoreduction is a safe and effective treatment method for patients with retinoblastoma, demonstrating the best tumor control in the younger age groups.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Retinoblastoma / Retinal Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Panama

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Retinoblastoma / Retinal Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Language: En Journal: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Panama