Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods.
Svobodová, Lada; Rucki, Marian; Vlkova, Alena; Kejlova, Kristina; Jírová, Dagmar; Dvorakova, Marketa; Kolarova, Hana; Kandárová, Helena; Pôbis, Peter; Heinonen, Tuula; Maly, Marek.
Affiliation
  • Svobodová L; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Rucki M; Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Vlkova A; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Kejlova K; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Jírová D; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Dvorakova M; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Kolarova H; Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Kandárová H; Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Pôbis P; Centre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Heinonen T; Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Maly M; Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
ALTEX ; 38(3): 419-430, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497461
ABSTRACT
Medical devices must be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensi­tization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test but does not exclude the use of in vitro methods that have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for medical device testing. It is foreseen that, due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, a combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D) methods in comparison with the in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) method and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical device extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as non-sensitizing in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding non-sensitizing samples; however, some discrepancies in positive classification were recorded. A testing strategy is suggested in which negative results are accepted and any positive results in the in chemico or in vitro tests are followed up with a third in vitro test and evaluated in accordance with the "2 out of 3 approach". This strategy may reduce and replace animal use for testing the sensitization potential of medical devices.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Animal Testing Alternatives Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: ALTEX Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Czech Republic

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Animal Testing Alternatives Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: ALTEX Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Czech Republic
...