Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agreement and Diagnostic Test Accuracy on Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Using Fundus Photographs by Allied Medical Personnel at a Community Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program in Nepal.
Thapa, Raba; Bajimaya, Sanyam; Pradhan, Eli; Sharma, Sanjita; Kshetri, Bal Bahadur; Paudel, Manish; Paudyal, Govinda.
Affiliation
  • Thapa R; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Bajimaya S; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Pradhan E; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Sharma S; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Kshetri BB; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Paudel M; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Paudyal G; Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 28(6): 509-515, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502930
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess the agreement and diagnostic test accuracy of DR grading using fundus photographs by the allied medical personnel (AMP) as compared to ophthalmologist at DR screening program.

Methods:

Two 45 degree disc-centred and macula centred fundus photographs captured using digital fundus camera from 1344 eyes were graded by six AMP twice at three months and six months of training. DR grading was done using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Retina specialist grading was taken as the reference standard. Percentage agreement using kappa coefficient (k) and diagnostic test accuracy were assessed.

Results:

Intra-rater agreement of most AMP was almost perfect for detection of any DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) at three and six months. Inter-rater agreement at 3 months at second grading was substantial for any DR (k = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.68) and VTDR (k = 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.75). Inter-rater agreement in 6 months at second grading was also substantial for any DR (k = 0.66; 95% CI 0.61-0.71) and VTDR (k = 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.75). The sensitivity and specificity for any DR at second grading in 3 months was 94.99% and 63.97% and at 6 months was 95.55% and 66.91%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The inter-rater agreement of AMP as compared to ophthalmologists for any DR or VTDR was substantial at both 3 and 6 months. AMP can support as first-level DR graders for timely referral and treatment of VTDR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus / Diabetic Retinopathy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Nepal

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus / Diabetic Retinopathy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Nepal