Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Local tumour control and radiation side effects for fractionated stereotactic photon beam radiotherapy compared to proton beam radiotherapy in uveal melanoma.
van Beek, Jackelien G M; Ramdas, Wishal D; Angi, Martina; van Rij, Caroline M; Naus, Nicole C; Kacperek, Andrzej; Errington, Roger D; Damato, Bertil; Heimann, Heinrich; Kiliç, Emine.
Affiliation
  • van Beek JGM; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.vanbeek@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Ramdas WD; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Angi M; Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom.
  • van Rij CM; Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Naus NC; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kacperek A; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
  • Errington RD; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom.
  • Damato B; Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Heimann H; Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, United Kingdom.
  • Kiliç E; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.kilic@erasmusmc.nl.
Radiother Oncol ; 157: 219-224, 2021 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549643
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the adverse side effects of fractionated stereotactic photon beam radiotherapy (fSRT) with proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM).

METHODS:

A retrospective study investigating 306 UM patients treated with fSRT (N=153) by the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study group (ROMS), The Netherlands, between 1999-2014 or with PBR (N=153) at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital and the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, United Kingdom, between 1993-2014. The tumours treated with fSRT were matched with tumours treated with PBR based on sex, left or right eye, TNM classification, posterior margin ≤ or > 3mm of the fovea and of the optic disc.

RESULTS:

The five-year actuarial rates of tumour recurrence were 4.5% for fSRT and 6.1% for PBR. For fSRT and PBR, the five-year actuarial rates of maculopathy were 14.9% and 12.4%, and for vitreous haemorrhage were 29.4% and 4.7%, respectively. Only vitreous haemorrhage (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.56) was more common after fSRT compared to PBR. Overall, larger tumours were risk factors for maculopathy and secondary enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both treatments have excellent local tumour control. In matched groups, vitreous haemorrhage was the only adverse side effect showing a significant difference between groups.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uveal Neoplasms / Radiosurgery / Melanoma Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uveal Neoplasms / Radiosurgery / Melanoma Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2021 Document type: Article