Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiency of the RADPAD Surgical Cap in Reducing Brain Exposure During Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation.
Lemesre, Camille; Graf, Denis; Bisch, Laurence; Carroz, Patrice; Cherbuin, Nicolas; Damet, Jérôme; Desorgher, Laurent; Siklody, Claudia Herrera; Le Bloa, Mathieu; Pascale, Patrizio; Pruvot, Etienne.
Affiliation
  • Lemesre C; Institute for Radiation Physics, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Graf D; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Bisch L; Cabinet Bisch Mock, Nyon, Switzerland.
  • Carroz P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Cherbuin N; Institute for Radiation Physics, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Damet J; Institute for Radiation Physics, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Desorgher L; Institute for Radiation Physics, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Siklody CH; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Le Bloa M; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Pascale P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Pruvot E; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: etienne.pruvot@chuv.ch.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 7(2): 161-170, 2021 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602396
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the RADPAD No Brainer (Worldwide Innovation and Technologies, Overland Park, Kansas) efficiency in reducing brain exposure to scattered radiation. BACKGROUND: Cranial radioprotective caps such as the RADPAD No Brainer are being marketed as devices that significantly reduce operator's brain exposure to scattered radiation. However, the efficiency of the RADPAD No Brainer in reducing brain exposure in clinical practice remains unknown to date. METHODS: Five electrophysiologists performing device implantations over a 2-month period wore the RADPAD cap with 2 strips of 11 thermoluminescent dosimeter pellets covering the front head above and under the shielded cap. Phantom measurements and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to further investigate brain dose distribution. RESULTS: Our study showed that the right half of the operators' front head was the most exposed region during left subpectoral device implantation; the RADPAD cap attenuated the skin front-head exposure but provided no protection to the brain. The exposure of the anterior part of the brain was decreased by a factor of 4.5 compared with the front-head skin value thanks to the skull. The RADPAD cap worn as a protruding horizontal plane, however, reduced brain exposure by a factor of 1.7 (interquartile range: 1.3 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: During device implantation, the RADPAD No Brainer decreased the skin front head exposure but had no impact on brain dose distribution. The RADPAD No Brainer worn as a horizontal plane worn around the neck reduces brain exposure and confirms that the exposure comes from upward scattered radiation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Occupational Exposure Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Occupational Exposure Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United States