Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison between deep learning convolutional neural networks and radiologists in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules on CT images.
Zhao, Hong-Bo; Liu, Chang; Ye, Jing; Chang, Lu-Fan; Xu, Qing; Shi, Bo-Wen; Liu, Lu-Lu; Yin, Yi-Li; Shi, Bin-Bin.
Affiliation
  • Zhao HB; Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
  • Liu C; Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
  • Ye J; Department of Radiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu province, Yangzhou, China.
  • Chang LF; Beijing Yizhun-ai Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
  • Xu Q; Department of Radiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu province, Yangzhou, China.
  • Shi BW; Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
  • Liu LL; Department of Radiology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  • Yin YL; Department of Radiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu province, Yangzhou, China. yinli_li15@163.com.
  • Shi BB; Department of Radiology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu province, Yangzhou, China.
Endokrynol Pol ; 72(3): 217-225, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619712
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We designed 5 convolutional neural network (CNN) models and ensemble models to differentiate malignant and benign thyroid nodules on CT, and compared the diagnostic performance of CNN models with that of radiologists. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively included CT images of 880 patients with 986 thyroid nodules confirmed by surgical pathology between July 2017 and December 2019. Two radiologists retrospectively diagnosed benign and malignant thyroid nodules on CT images in a test set. Five CNNs (ResNet50, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, SE-ResNeXt50, and Xception) were trained-validated and tested using 788 and 198 thyroid nodule CT images, respectively. Then, we selected the 3 models with the best diagnostic performance on the test set for the model ensemble. We then compared the diagnostic performance of 2 radiologists with 5 CNN models and the integrated model.

RESULTS:

Of the 986 thyroid nodules, 541 were malignant, and 445 were benign. The area under the curves (AUCs) for diagnosing thyroid malignancy was 0.587-0.754 for 2 radiologists. The AUCs for diagnosing thyroid malignancy for the 5 CNN models and ensemble model was 0.901-0.947. There were significant differences in AUC between the radiologists' models and the CNN models (p < 0.05). The ensemble model had the highest AUC value.

CONCLUSIONS:

Five CNN models and an ensemble model performed better than radiologists in distinguishing malignant thyroid nodules from benign nodules on CT. The diagnostic performance of the ensemble model improved and showed good potential.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thyroid Nodule / Deep Learning Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Endokrynol Pol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thyroid Nodule / Deep Learning Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Endokrynol Pol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China