Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Growth Differentiation Factor 15-Based Risk Score Model to Predict Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients.
Chang, Jia-Feng; Chen, Po-Cheng; Hsieh, Chih-Yu; Liou, Jian-Chiun.
Affiliation
  • Chang JF; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan.
  • Chen PC; Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan.
  • Hsieh CY; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan.
  • Liou JC; Graduate Institute of Aerospace and Undersea Medicine, Department of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(2)2021 Feb 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33670413
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The risk of cardiovascular (CV) and fatal events remains extremely high in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD), and the growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has emerged as a valid risk stratification biomarker. We aimed to develop a GDF15-based risk score as a death prediction model for MHD patients.

METHODS:

Age, biomarker levels, and clinical parameters were evaluated at study entry. One hundred and seventy patients with complete information were finally included for data analysis. We performed the Cox regression analysis of various prognostic factors for mortality. Then, age, GDF15, and robust clinical predictors were included as a risk score model to assess the predictive accuracy for all-cause and CV death in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS:

Age, GDF15, and albumin were significantly associated with higher all-cause and CV mortality risk that were combined as a risk score model. The highest tertile of GDF-15 (>1707.1 pg/mL) was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) 3.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-7.82), p < 0.05) and CV mortality (aHRs 3.11 (95% CI 1.02-9.50), p < 0.05). The ROC analysis of GDF-15 tertiles for all-cause and CV mortality showed 0.68 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.77) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.79), respectively. By contrast, the GDF15-based prediction model for all-cause and CV mortality showed 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.81), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Age, GDF15, and hypoalbuminemia predict all-cause and CV death in MHD patients, yet a combination scoring system provides more robust predictive powers. An elevated GDF15-based risk score warns clinicians to determine an appropriate intervention in advance. In light of this, the GDF15-based death prediction model could be developed in the artificial intelligence-based precision medicine.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan
...