Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations.
Travis, Katherine R; Heald, Colette L; Allen, Hannah M; Apel, Eric C; Arnold, Stephen R; Blake, Donald R; Brune, William H; Chen, Xin; Commane, Róisín; Crounse, John D; Daube, Bruce C; Diskin, Glenn S; Elkins, James W; Evans, Mathew J; Hall, Samuel R; Hintsa, Eric J; Hornbrook, Rebecca S; Kasibhatla, Prasad S; Kim, Michelle J; Luo, Gan; McKain, Kathryn; Millet, Dylan B; Moore, Fred L; Peischl, Jeffrey; Ryerson, Thomas B; Sherwen, Tomás; Thames, Alexander B; Ullmann, Kirk; Wang, Xuan; Wennberg, Paul O; Wolfe, Glenn M; Yu, Fangqun.
Affiliation
  • Travis KR; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Heald CL; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Allen HM; Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Apel EC; Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Arnold SR; Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Blake DR; Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Brune WH; Department of Chemistry, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Chen X; Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Commane R; University of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Crounse JD; Dept. of Earth & Environmental Sciences of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
  • Daube BC; Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Diskin GS; Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Elkins JW; NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
  • Evans MJ; Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Hall SR; Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK.
  • Hintsa EJ; National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), University of York, York, UK.
  • Hornbrook RS; Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Kasibhatla PS; Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Kim MJ; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
  • Luo G; Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • McKain K; Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Millet DB; Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Moore FL; Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Peischl J; Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University of Albany, Albany, NY, USA.
  • Ryerson TB; Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Sherwen T; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
  • Thames AB; University of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Ullmann K; Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Wang X; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
  • Wennberg PO; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
  • Wolfe GM; Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Yu F; Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA.
Atmos Chem Phys ; 20(13): 7753-7781, 2020 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688335
ABSTRACT
The global oxidation capacity, defined as the tropospheric mean concentration of the hydroxyl radical (OH), controls the lifetime of reactive trace gases in the atmosphere such as methane and carbon monoxide (CO). Models tend to underestimate the methane lifetime and CO concentrations throughout the troposphere, which is consistent with excessive OH. Approximately half of the oxidation of methane and non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is thought to occur over the oceans where oxidant chemistry has received little validation due to a lack of observational constraints. We use observations from the first two deployments of the NASA ATom aircraft campaign during July-August 2016 and January-February 2017 to evaluate the oxidation capacity over the remote oceans and its representation by the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. The model successfully simulates the magnitude and vertical profile of remote OH within the measurement uncertainties. Comparisons against the drivers of OH production (water vapor, ozone, and NO y concentrations, ozone photolysis frequencies) also show minimal bias, with the exception of wintertime NO y . The severe model overestimate of NO y during this period may indicate insufficient wet scavenging and/or missing loss on sea-salt aerosols. Large uncertainties in these processes require further study to improve simulated NO y partitioning and removal in the troposphere, but preliminary tests suggest that their overall impact could marginally reduce the model bias in tropospheric OH. During the ATom-1 deployment, OH reactivity (OHR) below 3 km is significantly enhanced, and this is not captured by the sum of its measured components (cOHRobs) or by the model (cOHRmod). This enhancement could suggest missing reactive VOCs but cannot be explained by a comprehensive simulation of both biotic and abiotic ocean sources of VOCs. Additional sources of VOC reactivity in this region are difficult to reconcile with the full suite of ATom measurement constraints. The model generally reproduces the magnitude and seasonality of cOHRobs but underestimates the contribution of oxygenated VOCs, mainly acetaldehyde, which is severely underestimated throughout the troposphere despite its calculated lifetime of less than a day. Missing model acetaldehyde in previous studies was attributed to measurement uncertainties that have been largely resolved. Observations of peroxyacetic acid (PAA) provide new support for remote levels of acetaldehyde. The underestimate in both model acetaldehyde and PAA is present throughout the year in both hemispheres and peaks during Northern Hemisphere summer. The addition of ocean sources of VOCs in the model increases cOHRmod by 3% to 9% and improves model-measurement agreement for acetaldehyde, particularly in winter, but cannot resolve the model summertime bias. Doing so would require 100 Tg yr-1 of a long-lived unknown precursor throughout the year with significant additional emissions in the Northern Hemisphere summer. Improving the model bias for remote acetaldehyde and PAA is unlikely to fully resolve previously reported model global biases in OH and methane lifetime, suggesting that future work should examine the sources and sinks of OH over land.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Atmos Chem Phys Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Atmos Chem Phys Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...