Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Immunohistochemical Expression of Cytokeratin 19, c-KIT, BerEP4, GATA3, and NUTM1 Between Porocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Goto, Keisuke; Ishikawa, Misawo; Hamada, Kengo; Muramatsu, Koji; Naka, Miho; Honma, Keiichiro; Sugino, Takashi.
Affiliation
  • Goto K; Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ishikawa M; Department of Pathology, Itabashi Central Clinical Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hamada K; Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Japan.
  • Muramatsu K; Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
  • Naka M; Department of Dermatology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
  • Honma K; Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kainan Hospital, Yatomi, Japan.
  • Sugino T; Department of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto, Japan; and.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 43(11): 781-787, 2021 Nov 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33767067
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Distinguishing porocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is clinically significant; however, differential diagnosis can often be challenging. This study sought to confirm the diagnostic utility of cytokeratin 19, c-KIT, BerEP4, GATA3, and NUTM1 immunohistochemistry in distinguishing porocarcinoma from SCC. Immunohistochemical analysis of cytokeratin 19, c-KIT, BerEP4, GATA3, and NUTM1 in 14 porocarcinomas and 22 SCCs was performed; the extents and intensities of expression of these markers were recorded. The statistical associations of the immunoexpression between porocarcinoma and SCC were analyzed using the Pearson χ2 test. Cytokeratin 19 was positive in 13 (92.9%) of 14 porocarcinomas, and for all the positive cases, staining was strong and evident in >20% of the tumor cells. By contrast, 9 (40.9%) of 22 SCCs expressed cytokeratin 19 (P = 0.0018), of which 6 showed extremely focal (≤10% of the tumor cells) expression. Of the 14 porocarcinomas, 11 (78.6%) cases showed c-KIT positivity, whereas only 3 of 22 SCCs (13.6%) expressed c-KIT focally (P = 0.0001). In addition, BerEP4 immunostaining differed between porocarcinomas and SCCs (57.1% vs. 9.1%, respectively; P = 0.0017). However, no significant difference between the groups was reported in terms of GATA3 expression (57.1% vs. 72.7%, respectively; P = 0.3336). NUTM1 was expressed in 4/14 (28.6%) porocarcinomas but not in the SCCs. Immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 19, c-KIT, and BerEP4 could be helpful in distinguishing porocarcinomas from SCCs. In addition, NUTM1 immunoexpression is highly specific, although not sensitive, to porocarcinomas. GATA3 immunohistochemistry has no meaningful implications in the differential diagnosis of porocarcinoma and SCC.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sweat Gland Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Eccrine Porocarcinoma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Dermatopathol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sweat Gland Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Eccrine Porocarcinoma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Dermatopathol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA