Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Questionnaire to Assess Life Impact of Treatment by Intravitreal Injections (QUALITII): Development of a patient-reported measure to assess treatment burden of repeat intravitreal injections.
McClard, Cynthia K; Wang, Rui; Windham, Victoria; Munoz, Jose; Gomez, Samuel; Fried, Sagit; Saroj, Namrata; Regillo, Carl; Wykoff, Charles Clifton; Strutt, Adriana M.
Affiliation
  • McClard CK; Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
  • Wang R; The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
  • Windham V; Ophthalmology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Munoz J; Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Gomez S; Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Fried S; Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Saroj N; Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
  • Regillo C; All Eyes Consulting, LLC, New York, New York, USA.
  • Wykoff CC; Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Strutt AM; Retina Consultants of Texas, Retina Consultants of America; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 6(1): e000669, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33912685
OBJECTIVE: To understand patient burden of treatment of repeated intravitreal injections (IVI) in the management of exudative retinal diseases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants were sampled from a large urban retina specialty practice in Houston, Texas, USA, based on history of ongoing receipt of IVI. The 50-item Questionnaire to Assess Life Impact of Treatment by Intravitreal Injections questionnaire was developed to evaluate the patient experience including discomfort, anxiety, inconvenience and satisfaction. Categorial principal components analysis (CATPCA) was performed to assess construct validity and internal consistency. A subset of these items was used to establish a measure of total treatment burden, referred to as the IVI Treatment Burden Score (TBS). RESULTS: 142 patients participated in this study. CATPCA analysis revealed five dimensions of patient burden: disruption of normal routine or capacity, anxiety, frequency of visits, chronicity of disease and perceived treatment value or satisfaction. Together, these dimensions accounted for 67% of variance explained. Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. The most frequently cited cause of discomfort was the feeling after anaesthetic wore off. The most common source of anxiety was fear of injection and associated discomfort or pain. Regarding inconvenience, patients reported temporary postinjection debilitation, requiring an average of 8 hours for recovery per treatment. The most frequently identified sources of satisfaction were confidence in the provider or treatment and interactions with staff. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding and quantifying the patient burden associated with repeated IVI for exudative retinal diseases can reveal opportunities to improve delivery methods. The TBS could serve to inform strategies to maximise treatment adherence and optimise patient experiences.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United kingdom