Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective multicenter study on personalized and optimized MDCT contrast protocols: results on liver enhancement.
Zanca, F; Brat, H G; Pujadas, P; Racine, D; Dufour, B; Fournier, D; Rizk, B.
Affiliation
  • Zanca F; Palindromo Consulting, Willem de Corylaan, 51 3001, Leuven, Belgium. federica.zanca@palindromo.consulting.
  • Brat HG; Institut de Radiologie de Sion, Groupe 3R, Sion, Switzerland.
  • Pujadas P; GE Healthcare, Buc, France.
  • Racine D; Institute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Dufour B; Institut de Radiologie de Sion, Groupe 3R, Sion, Switzerland.
  • Fournier D; Institut de Radiologie de Sion, Groupe 3R, Sion, Switzerland.
  • Rizk B; Centre d'Imagerie de Fribourg, Groupe 3R, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol ; 31(11): 8236-8245, 2021 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914115
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine a personalized and optimized contrast injection protocol for a uniform and optimal diagnostic level of liver parenchymal enhancement, in a large patient population enrolled in a multicenter study.

METHODS:

Six hundred ninety-two patients who underwent a standardized multi-phase liver CT examination were prospectively assigned to one contrast media (CM) protocol group G1 (100 mL fixed volume, 37 gI); G2 (600 mgI/kg of total body weight (TBW)); G3 (750 mgI/kg of fat-free mass (FFM)), and G4 (600 mgI/kg of FFM). Change in liver parenchyma CT number between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images was measured by two radiologists, on 3-mm pre-contrast and portal phase axial reconstructions. The enhancement histograms were compared across CM protocols, specifically according to a target diagnostic value of 50 HU. The total amount of iodine dose was also compared among protocols by median and interquartile range (IQR). The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess significant differences (p < 0.005), as appropriate.

RESULTS:

A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found across the groups with liver enhancement decreasing from median over-enhanced values of 77.0 (G1), 71.3 (G2), and 65.1 (G3) to a target enhancement of 53.2 HU for G4. Enhancement IQR was progressively reduced from 26.5 HU (G1), 26.0 HU (G2), and 17.8 HU (G3) to 14.5 HU (G4). G4 showed a median iodine dose of 26.0 gI, significantly lower (p < 0.001) than G3 (33.9 gI), G2 (38.8 gI), and G1 (37 gI).

CONCLUSIONS:

The 600 mgI/kg FFM-based protocol enabled a diagnostically optimized liver enhancement and improved patient-to-patient enhancement uniformity, while significantly reducing iodine load. KEY POINTS • Consistent and clinically adequate liver enhancement is observed with personalized and optimized contrast injection protocol. • Fat-free mass is an appropriate body size parameter for correlation with liver parenchymal enhancement. • Diagnostic oncology follow-up liver CT examinations may be obtained using 600 mgI/kg of FFM.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contrast Media / Iodine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contrast Media / Iodine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium