Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of a trauma comorbidity index with other measures of comorbidities to estimate risk of trauma mortality.
Jenkins, Peter C; Dixon, Brian E; Savage, Stephanie A; Carroll, Aaron E; Newgard, Craig D; Tignanelli, Christopher J; Hemmila, Mark R; Timsina, Lava.
Affiliation
  • Jenkins PC; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Dixon BE; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Savage SA; Indiana University, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Carroll AE; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Newgard CD; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Tignanelli CJ; Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Hemmila MR; Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Timsina L; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Acad Emerg Med ; 28(10): 1150-1159, 2021 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914402
BACKGROUND: Comorbidities influence the outcomes of injured patients, yet a lack of consensus exists regarding how to quantify that association. This study details the development and internal validation of a trauma comorbidity index (TCI) designed for use with trauma registry data and compares its performance to other existing measures to estimate the association between comorbidities and mortality. METHODS: Indiana state trauma registry data (2013-2015) were used to compare the TCI with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, a count of comorbidities, and comorbidities as separate variables. The TCI approach utilized a randomly selected training cohort and was internally validated in a distinct testing cohort. The C-statistic of the adjusted models was tested using each comorbidity measure in the testing cohort to assess model discrimination. C-statistics were compared using a Wald test, and stratified analyses were performed based on predicted risk of mortality. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. RESULTS: The study included 84,903 patients (50% each in training and testing cohorts). The Indiana TCI model demonstrated no significant difference between testing and training cohorts (p = 0.33). It produced a C-statistic of 0.924 in the testing cohort, which was significantly greater than that of models using the other indices (p < 0.05). The C-statistics of models using the Indiana TCI and the inclusion of comorbidities as separate variables-the method used by the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program-were comparable (p = 0.11) but use of the TCI approach reduced the number of comorbidity-related variables in the mortality model from 19 to one. CONCLUSIONS: When examining trauma mortality, the TCI approach using Indiana state trauma registry data demonstrated superior model discrimination and/or parsimony compared to other measures of comorbidities.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Comorbidity Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Comorbidity Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States