Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
FDG-PET/CT and Para-Aortic Staging in Endometrial Cancer. A French Multicentric Study.
Sallée, Camille; Margueritte, François; Gouy, Sébastien; Tardieu, Antoine; Belghiti, Jérémie; Lambaudie, Eric; Collinet, Pierre; Guyon, Frédéric; Legros, Maxime; Monteil, Jacques; Gauthier, Tristan.
Affiliation
  • Sallée C; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
  • Margueritte F; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
  • Gouy S; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94800 Villejuif, France.
  • Tardieu A; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
  • Belghiti J; Department of Gynecologic and Breast Surgery and Oncology, Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
  • Lambaudie E; Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 13009 Marseille, France.
  • Collinet P; Gynaecological Surgery Unit, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
  • Guyon F; Institut Bergonié, 229, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
  • Legros M; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
  • Monteil J; Nuclear Medicine Department, Limoges University Hospital, 87042 Limoges, France.
  • Gauthier T; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CHU Limoges, 87042 Limoges, France.
J Clin Med ; 10(8)2021 Apr 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33920565
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

FDG-PET/CT is a noninvasive examination that could be helpful for the management of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of FDG-PET/CT in assessing para-aortic lymph-node involvement in high-risk endometrial cancer.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective multicenter study including all patients who had a high-risk endometrial cancer with a preoperative FDG-PET/CT and a para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) between 2009 and 2019. The main objective was to evaluate the overall performance of FDG-PET/CT. The secondary objectives were to evaluate its performances according to the histological type and according to FDG-PET/CT date (before or after hysterectomy), and to compare its overall performance with that of the MRI scan.

RESULTS:

We included 200 patients from six different centers. After the false positive FDG-PET/CT was reread by nuclear physicians, FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 61.8%, a specificity of 89.7%, a positive predictive value of 69.4%, a negative predictive value of 86.1%, and an AUC of 0.76. There were no statistically significant differences in the performances according to either histological type and or FDG-PET/CT date. The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT was better than that of MRI (p < 0.01), but the specificity was not (p = 0.82).

CONCLUSION:

Currently, FDG-PET/CT alone cannot replace PAL for the lymph node evaluation of high-risk endometrial cancers. It seems essential to reread it in multidisciplinary meetings before validating the therapeutic management of patients, particularly in the case of isolated para-aortic involvement.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France