Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Study recruitment factors in advanced cancer: the Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2) - a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort project.
Kalpakidou, Anastasia K; Todd, Chris; Omar, Rumana Z; Keeley, Vaughan; Griffiths, Jane; Spencer, Karen; Vickerstaff, Victoria; Christidoulides, Karolina; Perry, Rachel; Katsampa, Dafni; Stone, Patrick.
Affiliation
  • Kalpakidou AK; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
  • Todd C; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester School of Health Sciences, Manchester, UK.
  • Omar RZ; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Keeley V; Palliative Medicine Department, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
  • Griffiths J; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester School of Health Sciences, Manchester, UK.
  • Spencer K; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester School of Health Sciences, Manchester, UK.
  • Vickerstaff V; Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Christidoulides K; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
  • Perry R; Marie Curie Hospice Solihull, Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
  • Katsampa D; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
  • Stone P; Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK p.stone@ucl.ac.uk.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33952580
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2) was a large multicentre observational study validating prognostic tools in patients with advanced cancer. Many palliative care studies fail to reach their recruitment target. To inform future studies, PiPS2 rigorously monitored and identified any potential recruitment barriers.

METHODS:

Key recruitment stages (ie, whether patients were eligible for the study, approached by the researchers and whether consent was obtained for enrolment) were monitored via comprehensive screening logs at participating sites (inpatient hospices, hospitals and community palliative care teams). The reasons for patients' ineligibility, inaccessibility or decision not to consent were documented.

RESULTS:

17 014 patients were screened across 27 participating sites over a 20-month recruitment period. Of those, 4642 (27%) were ineligible for participation in the study primarily due to non-cancer diagnoses. Of 12 372 eligible patients, 9073 (73%) were not approached, the most common reason being a clinical decision not to do so. Other reasons included patients' death or discharge before they were approached by the researchers. Of the 3299 approached patients, 1458 (44%) declined participation mainly because of feeling too unwell, experiencing severe distress or having other competing priorities. 11% (n=1841/17 014) of patients screened were enrolled in the study, representing 15% (n=1841/12 372) of eligible patients. Different recruitment patterns were observed across inpatient hospice, hospital and community palliative care teams.

CONCLUSIONS:

The main barrier to recruitment was 'accessing' potentially eligible patients. Monitoring key recruitment stages may help to identify barriers and facilitators to enrolment and allow results to be put into better context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13688211.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom