Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular and Glycemic Biomarkers.
Miao, Jennifer; Bachmann, Katherine N; Huang, Shi; Su, Yan Ru; Dusek, Jeffery; Newton-Cheh, Christopher; Arora, Pankaj; Wang, Thomas J.
Affiliation
  • Miao J; Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
  • Bachmann KN; Veterans Health AdministrationTennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville TN.
  • Huang S; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
  • Su YR; Vanderbilt Translational and Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville TN.
  • Dusek J; Vanderbilt Translational and Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville TN.
  • Newton-Cheh C; Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
  • Arora P; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
  • Wang TJ; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Case Western University Medical Center Cleveland OH.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(10): e017727, 2021 05 18.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960201
ABSTRACT
Background Experimental and observational studies have suggested a link between vitamin D and cardiovascular and metabolic disease, but this has not been confirmed in randomized controlled trials. We sought to determine whether vitamin D supplementation reduces biomarkers of insulin resistance, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, and lipids. Methods and Results This was a prespecified, secondary analysis of the DAYLIGHT (Vitamin D Therapy in Individuals at High Risk of Hypertension) randomized controlled trial. We measured circulating homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, renin, aldosterone, and lipids at baseline and at 6 months in 289 individuals with low vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25-OH-D] ≤25 ng/mL) receiving low-dose (400 IU/d) versus high-dose (4000 IU/d) vitamin D3 for 6 months. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting biomarker changes after vitamin D supplementation was then performed. Levels of 25-OH-D increased in the high-dose relative to the low-dose vitamin D group (+15.5 versus +4.6 ng/mL, P<0.001). Changes in biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, and neurohormonal activation did not differ by dose. Lipids did not differ between groups, other than triglycerides, which increased in the high-dose compared with the low-dose group (+11.3 versus -6.2 mg/dL, P<0.001). The meta-analysis showed potential modest decreases in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and hs-CRP, but no changes in low-density lipoprotein, after vitamin D supplementation compared with control groups. Conclusions In the DAYLIGHT randomized controlled trial, high-dose vitamin D supplementation did not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids. Registration URL https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT01240512.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vitamin D / Blood Glucose / Cardiovascular Diseases / Dietary Supplements Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vitamin D / Blood Glucose / Cardiovascular Diseases / Dietary Supplements Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Year: 2021 Document type: Article