Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Socioeconomic disparities in the management of coronary heart disease in 438 general practices in Australia.
Mnatzaganian, George; Lee, Crystal Man Ying; Robinson, Suzanne; Sitas, Freddy; Chow, Clara K; Woodward, Mark; Huxley, Rachel R.
Affiliation
  • Mnatzaganian G; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Australia.
  • Lee CMY; School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Australia.
  • Robinson S; Boden Collaboration for Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Sitas F; School of Public Health, Curtin University, Australia.
  • Chow CK; Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • Woodward M; Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Huxley RR; Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 28(4): 400-407, 2021 05 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966082
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This population-based cross-stional and panel study investigated disparities in the management of coronary heart disease (CHD) by level of socioeconomic status.

METHODS:

CHD patients (aged ≥18 years), treated in 438 general practices in Australia, with ≥3 recent encounters with their general practitioners, with last encounter being during 2016-2018, were included. Secondary prevention prescriptions and number of treatment targets achieved were each modelled using a Poisson regression adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic indicators, remoteness of patient's residence, comorbidities, lifetime follow-up, number of patient-general practitioner encounters and cluster effect within the general practices. The latter model was constructed using the Generalised Estimating Equations approach. Sensitivity analysis was run by comorbidity.

RESULTS:

Of 137,408 patients (47% women), approximately 48% were prescribed ≥3 secondary prevention medications. However, only 44% were screened for CHD-associated risk factors. Of the latter, 45% achieved ≥5 treatment targets. Compared with patients from the highest socioeconomic status fifth, those from the lowest socioeconomic status fifth were 8% more likely to be prescribed more medications for secondary prevention (incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.08 (1.04-1.12)) but 4% less likely to achieve treatment targets (incidence rate ratio 0.96 (0.95-0.98)). These disparities were also observed when stratified by comorbidities.

CONCLUSION:

Despite being more likely to be prescribed medications for secondary prevention, those who are most socioeconomically disadvantaged are less likely to achieve treatment targets. It remains to be determined whether barriers such as low adherence to treatment, failure to fill prescriptions, low income, low level of education or other barriers may explain these findings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Disease / General Practice Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Disease / General Practice Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia