Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of anaphylaxis recurrence and adrenaline autoinjector use in childhood.
Turgay Yagmur, Irem; Yilmaz Topal, Ozge; Kulhas Celik, Ilknur; Toyran, Muge; Civelek, Ersoy; Dibek Misirlioglu, Emine.
Affiliation
  • Turgay Yagmur I; From the Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey and.
  • Yilmaz Topal O; From the Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey and.
  • Kulhas Celik I; From the Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey and.
  • Toyran M; Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Health Science Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Civelek E; Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Health Science Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dibek Misirlioglu E; Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Health Science Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 42(3): e96-e100, 2021 05 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33980345
Introduction: Limited data are available on recurrent anaphylaxis in childhood. Delayed adrenaline administration is the major cause of deaths due to anaphylaxis. As well as prescribing the adrenaline autoinjector (AAI), it is important to make sure that the patient carries the device at all times and uses it correctly for the appropriate indication. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the recurrence of anaphylaxis and AAI use in childhood. Methods: Pediatric patients who were evaluated for anaphylaxis and prescribed AAI between January 2015 and December 2018, in the pediatric allergy and immunology clinic of our hospital were screened retrospectively. A telephone-based survey was conducted with the parents of the patients to investigate the recurrence of anaphylaxis in patients and the use of AAI by their parents for the management of anaphylaxis. Results: A total of 148 patients (64.9% boys) were prescribed an AAI for anaphylaxis. The telephone survey could be conducted with 111 parents (75%) with an AAI prescription. Of these patients, 23.4% (n = 26) of the parents reported that their children experienced recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis. In the recurrent anaphylaxis cases, the triggers were foods in 77%, venoms in 11.5%, drugs in 3.8%, and idiopathic anaphylaxis in 7.7% of the patients. AAI use at the time of anaphylaxis was reported by 42.3% of the parents. The reasons cited by the parents for not using AAI during an episode of anaphylaxis included the preference to have adrenaline administered at a health care facility because of its proximity (60%), fear of using the device (13.3%), hesitation (6.7%), not having the device with them (13.3%), and unavailability of the device (6.7%). Conclusion: Educating the patients and families about the importance of using AAI is crucial, and training on how to use the device should be repeated at each clinic visit and every opportunity.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anaphylaxis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Allergy Asthma Proc Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anaphylaxis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Allergy Asthma Proc Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States