Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients.
Halpern, Samantha E; Gupta, Aryaman; Jawitz, Oliver K; Choi, Ashley Y; Salfity, Hai V; Klapper, Jacob A; Hartwig, Matthew G.
Affiliation
  • Halpern SE; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gupta A; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Jawitz OK; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Choi AY; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Salfity HV; School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Klapper JA; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hartwig MG; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Thorac Dis ; 13(4): 2116-2127, 2021 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34012562
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, device implantation after transplantation has not been studied and may be concerning in these immunosuppressed patients. We explored the safety of the LINX Reflux Management System (MSA device) for management of GERD following lung transplantation (LTx).

METHODS:

Lung transplant recipients who underwent LINX implantation at our institution between 2017 and 2019 were followed prospectively in the Reflux Following Lung Transplantation and Associated Treatment Registry. Ambulatory pH testing and acid-suppressing medication use were compared before and after LINX implantation. One-year outcomes and change in pulmonary function were compared between matched LINX and fundoplication groups.

RESULTS:

Of 17 patients who underwent post-lung transplant LINX implantation, 8 (47.1%) agreed to undergo post-LINX pH testing. Three/eight (37.5%) patients achieved normal esophageal acid exposure time; 14 (82.4%) remained on acid-suppressing medication at one-year under the direction of their transplant teams. One-year patient survival and change in pulmonary function were similar between groups. LINX patients experienced more early side effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of the LINX MSA device in a cohort of lung transplant recipients at our institution was associated with similar short-term safety compared to traditional fundoplication, however assessment of efficacy was limited. Further investigation is needed to characterize the long-term efficacy of LINX implantation after LTx.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Thorac Dis Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Thorac Dis Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...