Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib with single agent ifosfamide in patients with advanced, inoperable, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma after failure of first-line chemotherapy: EORTC-1506-STBSG "ANITA".
Schöffski, Patrick; Toulmonde, Maud; Estival, Anna; Marquina, Gloria; Dudzisz-Sledz, Monika; Brahmi, Mehdi; Steeghs, Neeltje; Karavasilis, Vasilios; de Haan, Jacco; Wozniak, Agnieszka; Cousin, Sophie; Domènech, Marta; Bovée, Judith V M G; Charon-Barra, Céline; Marreaud, Sandrine; Litière, Saskia; De Meulemeester, Laura; Olungu, Christine; Gelderblom, Hans.
Affiliation
  • Schöffski P; Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: patrick.schoffski@uzleuven.be.
  • Toulmonde M; Sarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
  • Estival A; Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Badalona / Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol. B-ARGO, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Marquina G; Department of General Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Dudzisz-Sledz M; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Brahmi M; Centre Léon Bérard, Université Cl. Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Steeghs N; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Karavasilis V; University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • de Haan J; University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Wozniak A; Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Cousin S; Sarcoma Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
  • Domènech M; Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Badalona / Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol. B-ARGO, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Bovée JVMG; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Charon-Barra C; Department of Pathology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Marreaud S; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Litière S; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • De Meulemeester L; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Olungu C; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Gelderblom H; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer ; 152: 26-40, 2021 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062484
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

EORTC-1506-STBSG was a prospective, multicentric, randomised, open-label phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line nintedanib versus ifosfamide in patients with advanced, inoperable metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The primary end-point was progression-free survival. PATIENTS/

METHODS:

Patients with a variety of STS subtypes were randomised 11 to nintedanib (200 mg b.i.d. p.o. until disease progression) or ifosfamide (3 g/m2 i.v. days 1-3, every 21 days for ≤6 cycles). A Korn design was applied aiming to detect an improvement in median progression-free survival (mPFS) from 3 to 4.5 months (HR = 0.667). An interim look was incorporated to stop the trial for futility if <19 of the first 36 patients treated with nintedanib were progression-free at week 12.

RESULTS:

At the interim analysis, among the first 36 eligible and evaluable patients randomised for nintedanib, only 13 (36%) were progression-free at week 12. The trial was closed for further accrual as per protocol. In total, 80 patients were randomised (40 per treatment group). The mPFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-3.4) for nintedanib and 4.4 months (95% CI 2.9-6.7) on ifosfamide (adjusted HR = 1.56 [80% CI 1.14-2.13], p = 0.070). The median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.4-23.4) on nintedanib and 24.1 months (95% CI 10.9-NE) on ifosfamide (adjusted HR = 1.65 [95%CI0.89-3.06], p = 0.111). The clinical benefit rate for nintedanib and ifosfamide was 50% versus 62.5% (p = 0.368), respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were diarrhoea (35.9% of patients), fatigue (25.6%) and nausea (20.5%) for nintedanib; and fatigue (52.6%), nausea (44.7%) and vomiting, anorexia and alopecia (28.9% each) for ifosfamide.

CONCLUSION:

The trial was stopped for futility. The activity of nintedanib did not warrant further exploration in non-selected, advanced STSs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sarcoma / Medical Futility / Ifosfamide / Indoles Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sarcoma / Medical Futility / Ifosfamide / Indoles Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...