Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder.
Sharma, Manish; Talwar, Vineet; Maheshwari, Udip; Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu; Goel, Varun; Goyal, Sumit; Dash, Prasanta Kumar; Batra, Ullas; Bajaj, Rajat; Yadav, Abhishek; Goyal, Pankaj; Doval, Dinesh Chandra.
Affiliation
  • Sharma M; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Talwar V; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Maheshwari U; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Koyyala VPB; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Goel V; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Goyal S; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Dash PK; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Batra U; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Bajaj R; Department of Medical Oncology, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
  • Yadav A; Department of Medical Oncology, Fortis Escorts Hospitals, Delhi, India.
  • Goyal P; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
  • Doval DC; Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
South Asian J Cancer ; 9(4): 204-208, 2020 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131572
ABSTRACT
Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initial six cycles of gemcitabine and a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy were prospectively randomized on day 21 of the 6th cycle in 11 fashion to receive either maintenance gemcitabine 1 g/m 2 intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of three weekly cycle or observation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons by the log-rank test. A p -value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Of 60 patients, a total of 56 were available for final analysis. The median PFS was 4.7 months (3.1-6.3) in gemcitabine arm and 2.6 months (2.4-2.8) in observation arm, hazard ratio (HR) 0.196 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.39), p < 0.001. Median overall survival in gemcitabine arm was 12.4 months (9.15-15.6) as opposed to 9.9 months (8.29-11.5) in observation arm, HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.43-1.35), p = 0.354. The grade 3 or 4 side effects in maintenance arm were transaminitis (17.9%), thrombocytopenia (17.8%), neutropenia (14.2%), and febrile neutropenia (7.1%). Conclusions Maintenance gemcitabine therapy in unresectable/metastatic GBC patients responding to first-line gemcitabine and platinum treatment contributes to increase PFS with minimal and manageable side effects.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: South Asian J Cancer Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials Language: En Journal: South Asian J Cancer Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India