Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Platelet Component False Positive Detection Rate in Aerobic and Anaerobic Primary Culture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Corean, Jessica; White, Sandra K; Schmidt, Robert L; Walker, Brandon S; Fisher, Mark A; Metcalf, Ryan A.
Affiliation
  • Corean J; Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • White SK; Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Schmidt RL; Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Walker BS; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Fisher MA; Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Metcalf RA; Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: ryan.metcalf@path.utah.edu.
Transfus Med Rev ; 35(3): 44-52, 2021 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34158212
ABSTRACT
Septic reactions from platelet transfusions are one of the leading causes of transfusion-associated mortality. The FDA guidance for platelet bacterial risk control includes bacterial culture using both aerobic and anaerobic bottles. Several studies have reported false positive rates (FPR) of culture, but these data have not been summarized or influencing factors analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to published guidelines to assess the false positive rate and influencing factors. Eighteen studies were included for analysis. The combined aerobic/anaerobic FPR was 2.4 events per thousand (EPT) with a prediction interval of 0.5 to 5.7, while the aerobic FPR rate was 1.0 EPT (prediction interval 0.2-2.2) and the anaerobic rate was 1.8 EPT. Estimates were based on a total of almost 5 million units tested. The rate of false positives due to instrument error was between 0.5-1.7 EPT, while it was between 0.3-1.0 EPT for sampling contamination based on whether only aerobic, anaerobic, or aerobic/anaerobic cultures were performed. The FPR is approximately 2 to 5 times higher than the literature reported true positive rate of 0.5 EPT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Platelets / Platelet Transfusion Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Transfus Med Rev Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Platelets / Platelet Transfusion Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Transfus Med Rev Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States