Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Relaparoscopy" to treat early complications following colorectal surgery.
Rotholtz, Nicolas A; Laporte, Mariano; Matzner, Mariana; Schlottmann, Francisco; Bun, Maximiliano E.
Affiliation
  • Rotholtz NA; Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredón 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina. nrotholtz@hospitalaleman.com.
  • Laporte M; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. nrotholtz@hospitalaleman.com.
  • Matzner M; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Schlottmann F; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bun ME; Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredón 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3136-3140, 2022 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34159459
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic surgery has shown clear benefits that could also be useful in the emergency setting such as early reoperations after colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic reintervention ("relaparoscopy") (RL) to manage postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database from 2000 to 2019. Patients who required a reoperation after undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included. According to the approach used at the reoperation, the cohort was divided in laparoscopy (RL) and laparotomy (LPM). Demographics, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS:

A total of 159 patients underwent a reoperation after a laparoscopic colorectal surgery 124 (78%) had RL and 35 (22%) LPM. Demographics were similar in both groups. Patients who underwent left colectomy were more frequently reoperated by laparoscopy (RL 42.7% vs. LPM 22.8%, p 0.03). The most common finding at the reoperation was anastomotic leakage, which was treated more often by RL (RL 67.7% vs. LPM 25.7%, p 0.0001), and the most common strategy was drainage and loop ileostomy (RL 65.8% vs. LPM 17.6%, p 0.00001). Conversion was necessary in 12 patients (9.6%). Overall morbidity rate was 52.2%. Patients in the RL group had less postoperative severe complications (RL 12.1% vs. LPM 22.8, p 0.01). Mortality rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

Relaparoscopy is feasible and safe for treating early postoperative complications, particularly anastomotic leakage after left colectomy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Colorectal Surgery Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Colorectal Surgery Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Argentina