Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial.
Said, Catherine M; Delahunt, Marisa; Hardidge, Andrew; Smith, Paul; Tran, Phong; McDonald, Luke; Kefalianos, Emmanuel; Daniel, Cathy; Berney, Sue.
Affiliation
  • Said CM; Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. csaid@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Delahunt M; Physiotherapy Department, Western Health, St Albans, Australia. csaid@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Hardidge A; Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), St Albans, Australia. csaid@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Smith P; Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia. csaid@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Tran P; Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
  • McDonald L; Orthopaedics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
  • Kefalianos E; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Daniel C; Physiotherapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
  • Berney S; Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), St Albans, Australia.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 394, 2021 06 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187387
BACKGROUND: Early mobilization after surgery is a key recommendation for people with hip fracture, however this is achieved by only 50% of people. Recumbent bike riding has been used in other populations with limited mobility and has potential to allow early exercise in people post hip fracture. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a trial protocol designed to determine the effect of early post-operative cycling in bed on outcomes in people with hip fracture. METHODS: Single-blinded, multi-site randomized controlled pilot trial. Fifty-one people with hip fracture were recruited within 4 days of surgery from two sites in Victoria. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 25) or usual care plus active cycling in bed (n = 26). The cycling intervention was delivered on weekdays until the participant could walk 15 m with assistance of one person. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety. Clinical outcomes, including mobility (Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale) and delirium were measured at day seven post-operatively and at hospital discharge by an assessor blinded to group. Additional outcomes at discharge included gait speed, cognition and quality of life. RESULTS: The intervention was safe, feasible and acceptable to patients and staff. Delivery of the intervention was ceased on (median) day 9.5 (IQR 7, 12); 73% of scheduled sessions were delivered; (median) 4 sessions (IQR 2.0, 5.5) were delivered per participant with (median) 9 min 34 s (IQR 04:39, 17:34) of active cycling per session. The trial protocol was feasible, however at day seven 75% of participants had not met the criterion (able to walk 15 m with assistance of one person) to cease the cycling intervention.. CONCLUSION: In bed cycling is feasible post-operatively following hip fracture, however seven days post-operatively is too early to evaluate the impact of the cycling intervention as many participants were still receiving the intervention. A fully powered RCT to explore the effectiveness and cost efficiency of this novel intervention is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered (25/09/2017) with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTR N12617001345370 .
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Hip Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: BMC Geriatr Journal subject: GERIATRIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Hip Fractures Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: BMC Geriatr Journal subject: GERIATRIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom