Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinicopathological and Genomic Profiles of Atypical Fibroxanthoma and Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma Identify Overlapping Signatures with a High Mutational Burden.
Ak, Melike; Kahraman, Abdullah; Arnold, Fabian M; Turko, Patrick; Levesque, Mitchell P; Zoche, Martin; Ramelyte, Egle; Dummer, Reinhard.
Affiliation
  • Ak M; Dermatology Department, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kahraman A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Arnold FM; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Turko P; Pathology Department, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Levesque MP; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Zoche M; Pathology Department, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Ramelyte E; Dermatology Department, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Dummer R; Dermatology Department, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Genes (Basel) ; 12(7)2021 06 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34202213
ABSTRACT
Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) are rare tumors developing in chronically sun-exposed skin. Clinicopathological features are similar, but they differ in prognosis, while PDS has a more aggressive course with a higher risk for local recurrence and metastases. In current clinical practice, they are diagnosed by exclusion using immunohistochemistry. Thus, stringent diagnostic criteria and correct differentiation are critical in management and treatment for optimal outcomes. This retrospective single-center study collected clinicopathological data and tumor samples of 10 AFX and 18 PDS. Extracted genomic DNA from tumor specimens was analyzed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (FoundationOne-CDx™). Among 65 identified mutations, TP53 inactivating mutations were observed in all tumor specimens. In both AFX and PDS, the known pathogenic gene alterations in CDKN2A, TERT promoter, and NOTCH1 were frequently present, along with high mutational burden and stable Micro-Satellite Instability status. The mutational profiles differed only in ASXL1, which was only present in AFX. Further differences were identified in likely pathogenic and unknown gene alterations. Similarities in their genomic signatures could help to distinguish them from other malignancies, but they are not distinguishable between each other using the FoundationOne-CDx™ NGS panel. Therefore, histological criteria to determine diagnosis remain valid. For further insight, performing deep tumor profiling may be necessary.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sarcoma / Skin Neoplasms / DNA Mutational Analysis / Xanthomatosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Genes (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sarcoma / Skin Neoplasms / DNA Mutational Analysis / Xanthomatosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Genes (Basel) Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland