Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance Evaluation of Nasal Prong Interface for CPAP Delivery on a Critical Care Ventilator: A Bench Experiment.
Napolitano, Natalie; Roberts, Tracey; Nickel, Amanda J; McDonough, Joseph; Sun, Haorui; Feng, Rui; Jensen, Erik A; Dysart, Kevin; Lin, Richard.
Affiliation
  • Napolitano N; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. napolitanon@email.chop.edu.
  • Roberts T; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, California.
  • Nickel AJ; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • McDonough J; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Sun H; Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
  • Feng R; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Jensen EA; Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Dysart K; Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lin R; Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Respir Care ; 66(10): 1514-1520, 2021 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34230212
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The RAM cannula (Neotech, Valencia, CA) has become a commonly used interface for CPAP in neonatal intensive care. Performance characteristics of this interface used with a critical care ventilator are not well described.

METHODS:

This was a bench study utilizing a lung simulator configured as an actively breathing infant (weights of 800 g, 1.5 kg, and 3 kg) with moderate lung disease and a critical care ventilator in CPAP mode with leak compensation on. Three sizes of the RAM cannulae (preemie, newborn, and infant) were compared to 3 BabyFlow nasal prongs (Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany) (medium, large, and extra-large). Fabricated nasal models produced a 70% occlusive fit for the RAM cannula and an occlusive fit with the Dräger prongs. Delivered flow and pressure levels were recorded at 9 CPAP levels between 5 and 20 cm H2O.

RESULTS:

The Dräger prongs produced a mean airway pressure ([Formula see text]) within 0.20 cm H2O (range -0.10 to 0.35) of the set CPAP across all evaluated prong sizes and CPAP levels. In contrast, the RAM cannula produced [Formula see text] values that averaged 8.5 cm H2O (range -15 to -3.5) below the set CPAP levels. The deficit in delivered versus target CPAP level for the RAM cannula increased with greater set CPAP. Set CPAP of 5 cm H2O delivered [Formula see text] values that ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 cm H2O (difference of 3.5-4.4 cm H2O). Set CPAP of 20 cm H2O delivered [Formula see text] values that ranged from 5.0 to 8.4 cm H2O (difference of 11.7-15 cm H2O). Inspiratory flow required to achieve set CPAP levels did not differ between interfaces, suggesting high resistance in the RAM cannula device masks the delivered CPAP levels.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of the RAM cannula with a 30% leak on a critical care ventilator delivered [Formula see text] values lower than set CPAP. This may be clinically meaningful and should be considered when choosing a nasal interface.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ventilators, Mechanical / Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: Respir Care Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ventilators, Mechanical / Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Newborn Language: En Journal: Respir Care Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...