Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How prepared are Canadian trauma centres for mass casualty incidents?
Cameron, Andrew; Javidan, Arshia P; Nathens, Avery B; Cleghorn, Graham.
Affiliation
  • Cameron A; University of Toronto Emergency Medicine Residency Training Program, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: acameron@qmed.ca.
  • Javidan AP; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Arshia.javidan@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Nathens AB; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Tory Regional Trauma Program and the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Ca
  • Cleghorn G; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: graham.cleghorn@utoronto.ca.
Injury ; 52(9): 2625-2629, 2021 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246480
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Mass Casualty Incidents (MCIs) are rare but devastating events that require extensive planning in order to minimize morbidity and mortality. There are two broad categories limiting a hospital's response physical assets (e.g., critical care beds, operating rooms, food, communication devices) as well as operating procedures (e.g., MCI committees, regional coordination, provider training). The purpose of this study is to provide an examination of MCI preparedness according to these categories in Level 1 Trauma Centre across Canada.

METHODS:

This study surveyed all Level 1 Trauma Centres across Canada in order to assess the physical assets and operating procedures they had in place in the event of a hypothetical MCI on one of the busiest days of the year for trauma care.

RESULTS:

Of the 28 Trauma Centres contacted, 13 completed surveys (46%). Most hospitals had sufficient food (9/13) water (9/13), fuel (7/13), and communication assets (8/13) for a hypothetical MCI. A median of 38 mechanical ventilators could be mobilized. No hospitals mandated physician training for MCIs, and 6/13 centres were certain that they had a Strategic Emergency Management Plan (SEMP). Only 6/13 hospitals had dedicated MCI committees, Overall, 4/13 hospitals had explicit plans developed with community hospitals.

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrated that physical assets are generally less limiting than operating procedures. Four key areas of potential improvement have been identified 1) provider training (especially physicians), 2) coordination with small hospitals, 3) mechanical ventilator availability, and 4) MCI committees with explicit Strategic Emergency Management Plans.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disaster Planning / Mass Casualty Incidents Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Injury Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Disaster Planning / Mass Casualty Incidents Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Injury Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...