Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prophylactic funnel mesh to prevent parastomal hernia in permanent end colostomy: A retrospective cohort study.
Ammann, Yanic; Widmann, Bernhard; Sparn, Moritz; Warschkow, Rene; Weitzendorfer, Michael; Brunner, Walter.
Affiliation
  • Ammann Y; Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Widmann B; Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Sparn M; Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Warschkow R; Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Weitzendorfer M; Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Brunner W; Department of General, Visceral, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(10): 2627-2636, 2021 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265151
AIM: This study assessed the impact of a prophylactic, 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh on the rate of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal rectum resection with permanent end colostomy. METHODS: Data from 76 patients receiving permanent end colostomy after abdominoperineal rectum resection between 2013 and 2018 were collected retrospectively. Occurrences of parastomal hernia and reoperation rate due to parastomal hernia in patients with and without a prophylactic mesh were compared by univariate, multivariate, and propensity score-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two (28.9%) of the 76 included patients received a prophylactic mesh. The mean follow-up was 39.3 ± 23.8 months. Mesh implantation reduced the incidence of parastomal hernia to 9.1% (n = 2) compared to 42.6% (n = 23) in patients without a prophylactic mesh. The propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.48, p = 0.001). No reoperations due to parastomal hernia were needed in patients who received a prophylactic mesh, while nine patients without mesh (16.7%) required parastomal hernia repair (HR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.00-1.76, p = 0.015). Mesh implantation was not associated with increased short-term morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2, 31.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.468) or 30-day mortality (4.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic implantation of a 3D funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh is a safe and effective method to prevent parastomal hernia in patients requiring permanent end colostomy. Mesh placement significantly reduces reoperations due to parastomal hernia.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Surgical Stomas / Hernia, Ventral Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Surgical Stomas / Hernia, Ventral Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland Country of publication: United kingdom