Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increased Colorectal Cancer Screening Sustained with Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach.
Lee, Briton; Keyes, Erin; Rachocki, Carly; Grimes, Barbara; Chen, Ellen; Vittinghoff, Eric; Ladabaum, Uri; Somsouk, Ma.
Affiliation
  • Lee B; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Keyes E; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Rachocki C; Alameda County Behavioral Health, Oakland, California.
  • Grimes B; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Chen E; San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco, California.
  • Vittinghoff E; Alameda County Behavioral Health, Oakland, California.
  • Ladabaum U; Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Somsouk M; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: ma.somsouk@ucsf.edu.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(6): 1326-1333.e4, 2022 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280552
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Reports of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach effectiveness over time are minimal. We aimed to better evaluate a mailed FIT program with longitudinal metrics.

METHODS:

A total of 10,771 patients aged 50 to 75 years not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention arm received an advanced notification call and informational postcard prior to a mailed FIT. Usual care was at the discretion of the primary care provider. Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years. The primary outcome was the difference in cumulative proportion of completed FIT screening between arms. Screening was further examined with the proportion of time up-to-date, consistency of adherence, and frequency of abnormal FIT.

RESULTS:

The cumulative proportion of FIT completion was higher in the outreach intervention (73.2% vs 55.1%; P < .001). The proportion of time covered by screening was higher in the intervention group (46.8% vs 27.3%; Δ19.6%; 95% confidence interval, 18.2%-20.9%). Patients assigned to FIT outreach were more likely to consistently complete FITs (2 completed of 2 offered) (50.1% vs 21.8%; P < .001). However, for patients who did not complete the FIT during the first cycle, only 17.1% completed a FIT during the second outreach cycle. The number and overall proportion of abnormal FIT was significantly higher in the outreach intervention (6.9% Outreach vs 4.1% Usual Care; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Organized mailed FIT outreach significantly increased colorectal cancer screening over multiple years in this safety-net health system. Although mailing was overall effective, the effect was modest in patients who did not complete FIT in first cycle of intervention. (ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02613260).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article