The Unsalvageable Radial Head in Patients Aged 30 Years and Younger.

PURPOSE: Concern exists regarding the use of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) in younger patients. This study assessed clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of RHA in patients aged 30 years and younger. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 26 elbows that underwent a smooth stem modular RHA in patients aged 30 years and younger at a median follow-up of 3.3 years clinically and 2.9 years radiographically. The mean age was 24 ± 5 years. Indications were acute trauma in 13 patients and chronic pathologies in the remaining 13, and these 2 groups were evaluated separately. Patients underwent clinical, functional, and radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: Average arc of motion was 137° ± 16° in the cohort with acute trauma and 120° ± 24° in the cohort with chronic pathologies. Mean Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation scores were 23 ± 18 (acute) and 31 ± 19 (chronic). Mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 18 ± 15 (acute) and 23 ± 20 (chronic). Average Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores were 90 ± 9 (acute) and 80 ± 13 (chronic). Severe capitellar erosion was present in 1 patient (4%) in the cohort with chronic pathologies. Radiographic stem lucency was seen in all cases with 10 of these (38%) graded as severe. Moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral arthritis developed in 4 patients (15%), 3 of whom were in the chronic reconstruction group. Two patients (8%) required reoperation, 1 for persistent instability and 1 for stiffness, both in the cohort with chronic pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: For acute trauma and challenging chronic conditions involving the radial head in patients aged 30 years and younger, a smooth stem modular RHA is an option. Although reoperation rates based on this series are low, osteoarthritis is common when used for posttraumatic conditions and severe radiographic stem lucency was seen in greater than one-third of patients. These concerning features warrant close follow-up, and further long-term outcomes are needed. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.