Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Leadless pacemakers: A review of current data and future directions.
Middour, Thomas G; Chen, John H; El-Chami, Mikhael F.
Affiliation
  • Middour TG; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Chen JH; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • El-Chami MF; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: melcham@emory.edu.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 66: 61-69, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332661
Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have revolutionized the field of pacing by miniaturizing pacemakers and rendering them completelty intracardiac, hence reducing complications related to pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads. However, first generation LPs appear to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial perforation as compared to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PPM). Currently, LPs are predominantly designed to pace the right ventricle with no LPs that provide atrial or biventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on LPs while advocating for the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing LPs to TV-PPMs. In addition, we review the future directions of leadless devices.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pacemaker, Artificial / Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States