Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical analysis of cervical distraction.
Miller, L S; Cotler, H B; De Lucia, F A; Cotler, J M; Hume, E L.
Affiliation
  • Miller LS; Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 12(9): 831-7, 1987 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3441827
ABSTRACT
A biomechanical analysis of cervical distraction is presented, and a model comparing closed reduction of cervical spine dislocations to spring mechanics is developed. Behavior of a spring may be described as F = k delta x where F = distraction force; delta x = elongation of the spring; and k = spring constant. The records and roentgenograms of 24 cervical spine dislocations were reviewed retrospectively. Evaluation of cervical distraction vs traction weight indicates that Ftraction = kneck delta x; where F = traction weight and x = distraction at the injured level. The constant, kneck, is different for bilateral and unilateral dislocations (P less than .001) and is a function of magnitude of injury and neck morphology. As determined in this study, traction weight needed for reduction of facet dislocations may be estimated using the formulae Ftx = 107.1 lbs/cm (x) unilateral, and Ftx = 76.4 lbs/cm (x) bilateral.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cervical Vertebrae / Joint Dislocations Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Year: 1987 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cervical Vertebrae / Joint Dislocations Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Year: 1987 Document type: Article