Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical device-related pressure injuries in critical patients: prevalence and associated factors.
Galetto, Sabrina Guterres da Silva; do Nascimento, Eliane Regina Pereira; Hermida, Patrícia Madalena Vieira; Busanello, Josefine; de Malfussi, Luciana Bihain Hagemann; Lazzari, Daniele Delacanal.
Affiliation
  • Galetto SGDS; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • do Nascimento ERP; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Hermida PMV; Prefeitura Municipal de Florianópolis, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Busanello J; Universidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.
  • de Malfussi LBH; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Lazzari DD; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 55: e20200397, 2021.
Article in En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34435611
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in critical patients and analyze the associated factors.

METHOD:

Epidemiological, cross-sectional study. Sociodemographic, clinical and medical device data were collected. Inspection of the skin/mucous membranes was performed to identify and classify the injuries. Analysis using descriptive statistics, Poisson regression and the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS:

Ninety-three patients were evaluated and 58 developed injuries, with a prevalence of 62.4%. Injuries by the orotracheal tube (50%), nasogastric tube (44.1%) and urinary catheter (28.6%) were the most prevalent, and the most affected regions were, respectively, the auricular (79.5%), nasal ala (86.7%) and urethral meatus (76.9%). Factors associated with injuries were severe edema (p = 0.005), low Braden (p<0.001) and Glasgow (p = 0.008) scores, length of stay in intensive care (p<0.001) and hospitalization diagnosis classified as other causes (p<0.001). The use of more than one device (p<0.001) and a longer time of use (p<0.001) were correlated.

CONCLUSION:

The high prevalence of injuries and the associated factors indicate the need for preventive measures and risk monitoring.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure Ulcer Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Esc Enferm USP Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure Ulcer Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En / Pt Journal: Rev Esc Enferm USP Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil