Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What influences the provision and reception of oral health education? A narrative review of the literature.
Barnes, Emma; Bullock, Alison; Chestnutt, Ivor Gordon.
Affiliation
  • Barnes E; School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Bullock A; School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Chestnutt IG; School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 50(5): 350-359, 2022 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34519366
OBJECTIVES: Most common diseases of the mouth are preventable through behavioural changes, oral hygiene routines and regular professional care. Research suggests dental professionals may prioritize clinical experience, personal values and preferences over evidence when delivering such interventions. Research also suggests variable rates of patient behaviour change following oral health education (OHE) interactions. This review explores the literature to answer the question: what factors influence the provision and reception of OHE messages and the wider OHE process? METHODS: A structured search of literature was carried out with databases covering a range of academic disciplines (healthcare sciences, social sciences, education). Key words/terms were searched to elicit papers published since 1998. Citation mining (relevant citations within papers) and citation tracking (papers citing relevant papers) were also used. Recurring themes within the papers were identified and coded using NVivo12 and presented in a conceptual model. RESULTS: The studies analysed tended to employ small-scale surveys, larger-scale surveys (some with low response rates), or interview studies of varying sizes. There was also a limited number of review papers. However, several key messages were identified regarding dental professionals' and patients' views on OHE and the factors that influence its provision. Factors that were identified related to the wider social and policy context (macro), community-level factors (meso), the individual practitioner and patient (micro), factors that influenced the nature of OHE interaction and any resulting behaviour change, and how the outcomes of the process influence future OHE interactions for both parties. CONCLUSIONS: The literature highlighted how factors influence the OHE process before, during and after the educational interaction. The resultant conceptual model acknowledges the influence of wider 'upstream' factors alongside interpersonal and individual influences which should be taken into consideration when developing OHE interventions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oral Hygiene / Health Education, Dental Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Denmark

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Oral Hygiene / Health Education, Dental Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: Denmark