Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Intraoperative Choledochoscopy in the Treatment of Secondary Common Bile Duct Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Yin, Yifeng; He, Kai; Xia, Xianming.
Affiliation
  • Yin Y; Clinical Medical College, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
  • He K; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
  • Xia X; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 32(6): 612-619, 2022 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520269
Objective: To compare the safety and feasibility of T-tube drainage and primary suture after laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of secondary choledocholithiasis. Methods: The clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochoscopy combined with choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for secondary choledocholithiasis from June 2015 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different treatment method of common bile duct (CBD) incision, the patients were divided into a T-tube drainage group and a primary suture group. The preoperative clinical characteristics, results of preoperative liver function tests (LFTs), LFTs on the first day after the operation and the fourth day after the operation, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and times of postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative clinical data, preoperative LFTs, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > .05). However, primary suture demonstrated significant advantages (P < .05) in terms of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and other related factors. Bilirubin levels on the first day after the operation and the fourth day after the operation between the two groups suggested that T-tube drainage reduces bilirubin in the short term, but that long-term bilirubin draining is similar between the two strategies. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that choledochal diameter less than 8 mm was an independent risk factor for bile leakage. Conclusions: Laparoscopy combined with intraoperative choledochoscopic CBD exploration is superior to T-tube drainage in terms of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay. The ability of reducing bilirubin by traditional T-tube drainage is indeed better than that of primary suture in the early stage after operation, but there is no difference in long-term outcome between the two groups. Choledochal diameter ≤8 mm was an independent risk factor for bile leakage. To summarize, LCBDEs primary suture for secondary choledocholithiasis is safe and feasible.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gallstones / Laparoscopy / Choledocholithiasis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gallstones / Laparoscopy / Choledocholithiasis Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States