Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries.
Kapiriri, Lydia; Kiwanuka, Suzanne; Biemba, Godfrey; Velez, Claudia; Razavi, S Donya; Abelson, Julia; Essue, Beverley M; Danis, Marion; Goold, Susan; Noorulhuda, Mariam; Nouvet, Elysee; Sandman, Lars; Williams, Iestyn.
Affiliation
  • Kapiriri L; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.
  • Kiwanuka S; Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Upper Mulago Hill Road PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Biemba G; National Health Research Authority, Pediatric Centre of Excellence, PO Box 30075, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Velez C; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.
  • Razavi SD; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.
  • Abelson J; Department Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Communications Research Building, 2nd Floor, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Essue BM; Centre for Global Health Research, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada.
  • Danis M; Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20812, USA.
  • Goold S; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 2800 Plymouth Road Building 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
  • Noorulhuda M; Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Kenneth Taylor Hall Room 226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.
  • Nouvet E; School of Health Studies, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.
  • Sandman L; National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Williams I; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK.
Health Policy Plan ; 37(3): 297-309, 2022 Mar 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34545395
ABSTRACT
Priority setting represents an even bigger challenge during public health emergencies than routine times. This is because such emergencies compete with routine programmes for the available health resources, strain health systems and shift health-care attention and resources towards containing the spread of the epidemic and treating those that fall seriously ill. This paper is part of a larger global study, the aim of which is to evaluate the degree to which national COVID-19 preparedness and response plans incorporated priority setting concepts. It provides important insights into what and how priority decisions were made in the context of a pandemic. Specifically, with a focus on a sample of 18 African countries' pandemic plans, the paper aims to (1) explore the degree to which the documented priority setting processes adhere to established quality indicators of effective priority setting and (2) examine if there is a relationship between the number of quality indicators present in the pandemic plans and the country's economic context, health system and prior experiences with disease outbreaks. All the reviewed plans contained some aspects of expected priority setting processes but none of the national plans addressed all quality parameters. Most of the parameters were mentioned by less than 10 of the 18 country plans reviewed, and several plans identified one or two aspects of fair priority setting processes. Very few plans identified equity as a criterion for priority setting. Since the parameters are relevant to the quality of priority setting that is implemented during public health emergencies and most of the countries have pre-existing pandemic plans; it would be advisable that, for the future (if not already happening), countries consider priority setting as a critical part of their routine health emergency and disease outbreak plans. Such an approach would ensure that priority setting is integral to pandemic planning, response and recovery.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Policy Plan Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Equity_inequality Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Policy Plan Journal subject: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada
...