Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Two Methods (Inside-Out/Outside-In) Inferior Articular Process Resection for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note.
Kim, Hyeun-Sung; Wu, Pang-Hung; An, Jin-Woo; Lee, Yeon-Jin; Lee, Jun-Hyung; Kim, Myeong-Hun; Lee, Inkyung; Park, Jong-Sung; Lee, Jun-Hyung; Park, Jun-Hwan; Jang, Il-Tae.
Affiliation
  • Kim HS; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Wu PH; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • An JW; Orthopaedic Surgery, JurongHealth Campus, National University Health System, Singapore 609606, Singapore.
  • Lee YJ; Nanoori Hospital Spine And Joints Clinic, Dubai 66566, United Arab Emirates.
  • Lee JH; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Kim MH; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Lee I; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Park JS; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Lee JH; Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea.
  • Park JH; Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju 61452, Korea.
  • Jang IT; Neurosurgery Department, Medical School University, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Brain Sci ; 11(9)2021 Sep 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34573190
ABSTRACT

Objective:

There is limited literature comparing the uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion outside-in approach (ETLIF (O)) with the inside-out approach (ETLIF (I)).

Methods:

Radiological evaluation was performed on disc height restoration and coronal wedging angle, and operation time (inferior articular process resection time/total operation time) and clinical evaluation were made.

Result:

48 cases of inside-out and 38 cases of outside-in cases were included. Compared to inside-out, the outside-in approach had significantly less operative time required to resect inferior articular process 36.55 ± 10.37, and total operative time 87.45 ± 20.14 min compared to 49.83 ± 23.97 and 102.56 ± 36.53 min, respectively, for the inside-out approach, p < 0.05. Compared to the preoperative state, both cohorts achieved significant improvement of VAS and ODI at post-operative 1 week, 3 months and at final follow up. Both cohorts achieved statistically significant increased disc height with 5.00 ± 2.87 mm, 5.49 ± 2.33 mm and statistically significant improvement in coronal wedge angle with 1.76 ± 1.63°, 3.24 ± 2.92° in the inside-out and outside-in approaches respectively.

Conclusions:

Complete removal of inferior articular process is the key part of endoscopic fusion with two methods that can be applied an inside-out approach or an outside-in approach. Comparing both techniques, the outside-in approach has a shorter operative time required for inferior articular process resection and total length of operation with similar good clinical and radiological outcomes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article
...